MANDAGON (Playtest von Design Dynamos): Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus hagenberg.games Wiki
K (MANDAGON Schreibweise angepassat)
 
(6 dazwischenliegende Versionen von 2 Benutzern werden nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 3: Zeile 3:
== Playtest-Details ==
== Playtest-Details ==


Spiel: [[Mandagon]]  
Spiel: [[MANDAGON]]  


Playtester: [[Design Dynamos]]
Playtester: [[Design Dynamos]]
Zeile 16: Zeile 16:
* Sound Design, relaxende Musik
* Sound Design, relaxende Musik
* Schöne Animationen
* Schöne Animationen
* Angenehmes Movement
* Pacing
* Einfach, simpel


=== Was hat den Spieler*innen nicht gefallen? ===
=== Was hat den Spieler*innen nicht gefallen? ===


* es gibt kein Tutorial, man wird ins kalte Wasser geworfen, was anfangs zu starker Verwirrung führt
* es gibt kein Tutorial, man wird ins kalte Wasser geworfen, was anfangs zu Verwirrung führt
* Sprünge nicht anspruchsvoll
* Sprünge nicht anspruchsvoll
* Map nicht immer aufrufbar


=== Vorschläge für Verbesserungen ===
=== Vorschläge für Verbesserungen ===


* Erklärung wieso X Auswirkung auf Y hat
* Tutorial einfügen, Erklärung was zu machen ist
* background Musik einfügen
* Spiel schwerer machen
* Rätsel "erklären" bzw. verständlicher machen  
* Hinweise auf Teleporter
* Map immer aufrufbar machen


== Game Experience Questionnaire Resultat ==
== Game Experience Questionnaire Resultat ==
Zeile 36: Zeile 41:
! Frage !! Statement !! Durchschnittlicher Wert
! Frage !! Statement !! Durchschnittlicher Wert
|-
|-
| 1 || I felt content || 2
| 1 || I felt content || 2,75
|-
|-
| 2 || I felt skilful || 1,75
| 2 || I felt skilful || 1,75
|-
|-
| 3 || I was interested in the game's story || 2,5
| 3 || I was interested in the game's story || 1
|-
|-
| 4 || I thought it was fun || 2,25
| 4 || I thought it was fun || 2
|-
|-
| 5 || I was fully occupied with the game || 2,75
| 5 || I was fully occupied with the game || 2,25
|-
|-
| 6 || I felt happy || 0,75
| 6 || I felt happy || 2,5
|-
|-
| 7  || It gave me a bad mood || 0,5
| 7  || It gave me a bad mood || 0,25
|-
|-
| 8 || I thought about other things || 1
| 8 || I thought about other things || 0,75
|-
|-
| 9 || I found it tiresome || 0,5
| 9 || I found it tiresome || 1,75
|-
|-
| 10 || I felt competent || 2,5
| 10 || I felt competent || 2,75
|-
|-
| 11 || I thought it was hard || 1,5
| 11 || I thought it was hard || 1
|-
|-
| 12 || It was aesthetically pleasing || 1,5
| 12 || It was aesthetically pleasing || 3,5
|-
|-
| 13 || I forgot everything around me || 1,5
| 13 || I forgot everything around me || 1,5
|-
|-
| 14 || I felt good || 1,25
| 14 || I felt good || 2,5
|-
|-
| 15 || I was good at it || 1,75
| 15 || I was good at it || 2,25
|-
|-
| 16 || I felt bored || 0,5
| 16 || I felt bored || 2
|-
|-
| 17 || I felt successful || 2
| 17 || I felt successful || 2,25
|-
|-
| 18 || I felt imaginative || 1,75
| 18 || I felt imaginative || 2
|-
|-
| 19 || I felt that I could explore things || 1,75
| 19 || I felt that I could explore things || 3,25
|-
|-
| 20 || I enjoyed it || 2,5
| 20 || I enjoyed it || 2,5
|-
|-
| 21 || I was fast at reaching the game's targets || 1,25
| 21 || I was fast at reaching the game's targets || 2,25
|-
|-
| 22 || I felt annoyed || 0,25
| 22 || I felt annoyed || 1,5
|-
|-
| 23 || I felt pressured || 1,5
| 23 || I felt pressured || 0
|-
|-
| 24 || I felt irritable || 0,75
| 24 || I felt irritable || 0,25
|-
|-
| 25 || I lost track of time || 1,5
| 25 || I lost track of time || 1,75
|-
|-
| 26 || I felt challenged || 1
| 26 || I felt challenged || 1,25
|-
|-
| 27 || I found it impressive || 2,5
| 27 || I found it impressive || 2,5
|-
|-
| 28 || I was deeply concentrated in the game || 2,25
| 28 || I was deeply concentrated in the game || 2,5
|-
|-
| 29 || I felt frustrated || 0,5
| 29 || I felt frustrated || 1,25
|-
|-
| 30 || It felt like a rich experience|| 1,5
| 30 || It felt like a rich experience|| 1,5
|-
|-
| 31 || I lost connection with the outside world || 1,25
| 31 || I lost connection with the outside world || 1,5
|-
|-
| 32 || I felt time pressure || 0,5
| 32 || I felt time pressure || 0
|-
|-
| 33 || I had to put a lot of effort into it || 0,25
| 33 || I had to put a lot of effort into it || 1
|}
|}


Zeile 107: Zeile 112:
Die 7 Komponenten des Game Experience Questionnaire weisen die folgenden Mittelwerte auf:
Die 7 Komponenten des Game Experience Questionnaire weisen die folgenden Mittelwerte auf:


* Competence (Fragen 2, 10, 15, 17 und 21): '''1,85'''
* Competence (Fragen 2, 10, 15, 17 und 21): '''2,813'''
* Sensory and Imaginative Immersion (Fragen 3, 12, 18, 19, 27 und 30): '''1,917'''
* Sensory and Imaginative Immersion (Fragen 3, 12, 18, 19, 27 und 30): '''3,438'''
* Flow (Fragen 5, 13, 25, 28 und 31): '''1,85'''
* Flow (Fragen 5, 13, 25, 28 und 31): '''2,375'''
* Tension/Annoyance (Fragen 22, 24 und 29): '''0,5'''
* Tension/Annoyance (Fragen 22, 24 und 29): '''0,6'''
* Challenge (Fragen 11, 23, 26, 32 und 33): '''0,95'''
* Challenge (Fragen 11, 23, 26, 32 und 33): '''0,813'''
* Negative affect (Fragen 7, 8, 9 und 16): '''0,625'''
* Negative affect (Fragen 7, 8, 9 und 16): '''1,1875'''
* Positive affect (Fragen 1, 4, 6, 14 und 20): '''1,75'''
* Positive affect (Fragen 1, 4, 6, 14 und 20): '''3,063'''


[[Kategorie:Playtest]]
[[Kategorie:Playtest]]
[[Kategorie:Playtest im SS 2024]]
[[Kategorie:Playtest im SS 2024]]

Aktuelle Version vom 27. Juni 2024, 13:45 Uhr

Dies ist ein Playtest-Report des Teams Design Dynamos für das Fach Game Design Fundamentals.

Playtest-Details

Spiel: MANDAGON

Playtester: Design Dynamos

Anzahl der durchgeführten Tests: 5

Interview

Was hat den Spieler*innen gefallen?

  • Schöner Retro Art Style
  • Sound Design, relaxende Musik
  • Schöne Animationen
  • Angenehmes Movement
  • Pacing
  • Einfach, simpel

Was hat den Spieler*innen nicht gefallen?

  • es gibt kein Tutorial, man wird ins kalte Wasser geworfen, was anfangs zu Verwirrung führt
  • Sprünge nicht anspruchsvoll
  • Map nicht immer aufrufbar

Vorschläge für Verbesserungen

  • Tutorial einfügen, Erklärung was zu machen ist
  • Spiel schwerer machen
  • Hinweise auf Teleporter
  • Map immer aufrufbar machen

Game Experience Questionnaire Resultat

Die Tabelle zeigt die Mittelwerte des Game Experience Questionnaire, die bei den einzelnen Fragen in den Playtests erzielt wurden.

Frage Statement Durchschnittlicher Wert
1 I felt content 2,75
2 I felt skilful 1,75
3 I was interested in the game's story 1
4 I thought it was fun 2
5 I was fully occupied with the game 2,25
6 I felt happy 2,5
7 It gave me a bad mood 0,25
8 I thought about other things 0,75
9 I found it tiresome 1,75
10 I felt competent 2,75
11 I thought it was hard 1
12 It was aesthetically pleasing 3,5
13 I forgot everything around me 1,5
14 I felt good 2,5
15 I was good at it 2,25
16 I felt bored 2
17 I felt successful 2,25
18 I felt imaginative 2
19 I felt that I could explore things 3,25
20 I enjoyed it 2,5
21 I was fast at reaching the game's targets 2,25
22 I felt annoyed 1,5
23 I felt pressured 0
24 I felt irritable 0,25
25 I lost track of time 1,75
26 I felt challenged 1,25
27 I found it impressive 2,5
28 I was deeply concentrated in the game 2,5
29 I felt frustrated 1,25
30 It felt like a rich experience 1,5
31 I lost connection with the outside world 1,5
32 I felt time pressure 0
33 I had to put a lot of effort into it 1

Auswertung der Komponenten

Die 7 Komponenten des Game Experience Questionnaire weisen die folgenden Mittelwerte auf:

  • Competence (Fragen 2, 10, 15, 17 und 21): 2,813
  • Sensory and Imaginative Immersion (Fragen 3, 12, 18, 19, 27 und 30): 3,438
  • Flow (Fragen 5, 13, 25, 28 und 31): 2,375
  • Tension/Annoyance (Fragen 22, 24 und 29): 0,6
  • Challenge (Fragen 11, 23, 26, 32 und 33): 0,813
  • Negative affect (Fragen 7, 8, 9 und 16): 1,1875
  • Positive affect (Fragen 1, 4, 6, 14 und 20): 3,063